Life before Unicode
Unicode definitely added a lot of complexity to string handling, and people who use languages with ASCII alphabets exclusively may think it's unjustified. However, I'm a non-ASCII language speaker who's old enough to remember the alternatives, and the alternatives are far worse than the complexity of Unicode.
For the record, I got started with computers in the early 2000’s Russia. The Russian language uses an alphabet based on the Cyrillic script. As far as non-ASCII languages go, it’s relatively simple: 33 letters, each has uppercase and lowercase versions, and the upper/lower case transform is invertible. Since it’s just 33 letters, you can fit it in an 8-bit encoding and still have room for pseudographics.
The catch is that, for a time, Russian had three almost equally common encodings.
One reason is a complicated history of the Soviet Union and computing—it’s been isolated from the rest of the world, and all organizations that produced computer hardware and software were government-owned, so they could impose a standard on them. When the USSR broke down, the market was quickly captured by Western hardware and software1 because no one was making Soviet hardware anymore anyway.2 Private software companies started to produce software for imported OSes right away, too—at first that meant DOS.3
Old Soviet systems mostly4 used an encoding named KOI8-R. KOI stands for “Код Обмена Информацией” (Information Interchange Code), 8 means 8-bit, and R means Russian (there’s also a Ukrainian version named KOI8-U, the Ukrainian alphabet is distinct from Russian). That encoding is, to put it politely, mildly insane: it was designed so that stripping the 8th bit from it leaves you with a somewhat readable ASCII transliteration of the Russian alphabet, so Russian letters don’t come in their usual order.
DOS used CP866. It’s rather less insane, maintains the order of letters, and covers a few languages with Cyrillic alphabets. What happened when Windows came? Microsoft developed a new encoding, Windows-1251.
Did they add seamless transcoding for old files from DOS? Of course not! A Russian version of Windows effectively used two different encodings: native Windows parts used Windows-1251, while the DOS subsystem still used CP866. If you typed your programming assignment in Turbo Pascal5 and wrote any comments in Russian, you could not open it in notepad.exe for printing—the comments would end up unreadable.
So, things were bad enough without the Internet, but when Internet connectivity started to get more accessible, things got much worse because you wouldn’t even know what OS a file originally came from.
Additionally, the Internet runs on UNIX-like systems. Proprietary UNIX hardware (Sun, HP etc.) was too expensive for most companies, and the rapid growth of the Internet in Russia coincided with the rapid growth of open-source software adoption, so in practice UNIX-like meant FreeBSD and Linux. This means we can ignore the fact that proprietary UNIX systems used ISO 8859-5—that fact didn’t affect an average person. Only the encoding choices of free and open-source systems did.
FreeBSD and Linux used… KOI8-R, the Soviet encoding.6 The main reason is that the old Soviet UNIX-like systems used it (e.g. DEMOS, and when old installations were migrated to the new OSes, it was probably a natural choice. Besides, KOI8-R was not from Microsoft. Linux had support for Windows-1251 for a long time, but I haven’t seen anyone use it—the default was KOI8-R and everyone went along with it (myself included, though I switched to Unicode as soon as it became an option).
So, by the late 90’s there was a situation when most web, email, or IRC servers were running UNIX-like OSes with KOI8-R, while most workstations were running Windows with Windows-1251. That made encoding confusion a part of the daily life for most Internet users.
Ironically, trying to run Shtirlitz (or any other Windows program with Windows-1251 text baked in) on a system that comes without Windows-1251 support produces the very issue with garbled text it was supposed to solve. It’s not a ReactOS issue—you will have the same problem in Microsoft Windows if it doesn’t have Russian language support installed.
Speaking of Windows, mounting Windows drives on Linux had its own challenges. If you used KOI8-R in the Linux system, you’d have to remember to specify
if you wanted Russian file names to be readable.
Web browsers didn’t have encoding detection for quite a while either, so most websites offered multiple versions in different encodings. That, oddly, made a splash page a useful part of the website rather than an anti-pattern: since you couldn’t count on immediate readability of normal text in the viewer’s web browser, you had to present the website description and encoding selection menu in the form of images.
Website encoding auto-detection was a solved problem when I started browing and making websites, so I only saw encoding choice menus on websites that were outdated even in the early 2000’s.
However, IRC had that problem for much longer. The IRC protocol has no notion of encoding, everything it a byte stream to it. The RUSNet IRC network had a modified IRCd capable of automated transcoding, and used different ports for clients with different encodings.
They mentioned those port settings very prominently in the connecting instructions, but newbies messed it up all the time and ended up sending unreadable text to channels. Experienced users learned to recognize common encoding issues visually and some could even reply in the encoding readable for the unfortunate newbie (though most simply sent them a link to the relevant tutorial section).
Obviously, I’m very happy to see Unicode win because none of those problems exist in a Unicode world.
1Mostly by pirated copies of that software because no one had money to pay for licenses anyway, and copyright enfocement was almost non-existent in the 90’s
2That hardware was too outdated to keep producing in any case, and couldn’t complete in a free market.
3Apple hardware was almost non-existent in Russia at the time because of its price, it’s still very niche.
5Which is a DOS program.
6The ultimate evidence that open source is like communism.